<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Java desktop links of the week, October 26</title>
	<atom:link href="http://JonathanGiles.net/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://JonathanGiles.net/blog/?p=626</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:29:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Developer Dude</title>
		<link>http://JonathanGiles.net/blog/?p=626&#038;cpage=1#comment-32378</link>
		<dc:creator>Developer Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://JonathanGiles.net/blog/?p=626#comment-32378</guid>
		<description>PureSwing looked interesting until I got to this:

&quot;no support for native look and feels&quot;.

Eh, call me when the big three native L&amp;Fs (Windows, OSX, Linux) are supported. Until then it is just a plaything not intended for real development. Yes, I am a bit of a bigot when it comes to L&amp;Fs; I feel that for many/most apps, especially business apps, the app must be indistinguishable from a native app or clients/users won&#039;t accept it. Use of non-native L&amp;Fs has done almost as much harm to Swing based apps as has bad Swing practices which result in slow and buggy Swing apps written by devs who don&#039;t know how to use Swing correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PureSwing looked interesting until I got to this:</p>
<p>&#8220;no support for native look and feels&#8221;.</p>
<p>Eh, call me when the big three native L&amp;Fs (Windows, OSX, Linux) are supported. Until then it is just a plaything not intended for real development. Yes, I am a bit of a bigot when it comes to L&Fs; I feel that for many/most apps, especially business apps, the app must be indistinguishable from a native app or clients/users won&#8217;t accept it. Use of non-native L&amp;Fs has done almost as much harm to Swing based apps as has bad Swing practices which result in slow and buggy Swing apps written by devs who don&#8217;t know how to use Swing correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://JonathanGiles.net/blog/?p=626&#038;cpage=1#comment-32375</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://JonathanGiles.net/blog/?p=626#comment-32375</guid>
		<description>Thanks Eugene, but I really want to cover recent news, not blog posts from so long ago. However, if news does come up, please feel free to email me at jonathan.giles@sun.com.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eugene, but I really want to cover recent news, not blog posts from so long ago. However, if news does come up, please feel free to email me at <a href="mailto:jonathan.giles@sun.com">jonathan.giles@sun.com</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://JonathanGiles.net/blog/?p=626&#038;cpage=1#comment-32374</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://JonathanGiles.net/blog/?p=626#comment-32374</guid>
		<description>Here is the start: Twitter client written in Scala/Swing
http://briccetti.blogspot.com/search/label/Swing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the start: Twitter client written in Scala/Swing<br />
<a href="http://briccetti.blogspot.com/search/label/Swing" rel="nofollow">http://briccetti.blogspot.com/search/label/Swing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://JonathanGiles.net/blog/?p=626&#038;cpage=1#comment-32373</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://JonathanGiles.net/blog/?p=626#comment-32373</guid>
		<description>@Eugene: I would happily cover it if I was emailed news articles on it. As it stands, I go looking for as much news as I can find, but there is certainly stuff I&#039;m going to miss. Please, feel free to email me with Scala.swing related news if you wish.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://JonathanGiles.net/blog/?p=626#comment-32374">Eugene</a>: I would happily cover it if I was emailed news articles on it. As it stands, I go looking for as much news as I can find, but there is certainly stuff I&#8217;m going to miss. Please, feel free to email me with Scala.swing related news if you wish.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://JonathanGiles.net/blog/?p=626&#038;cpage=1#comment-32372</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://JonathanGiles.net/blog/?p=626#comment-32372</guid>
		<description>Suggestion. 
Why don&#039;t you start covering scala.swing too? 
IMO even the library itself is interesting and based on Swing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggestion.<br />
Why don&#8217;t you start covering scala.swing too?<br />
IMO even the library itself is interesting and based on Swing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://JonathanGiles.net/blog/?p=626&#038;cpage=1#comment-32367</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://JonathanGiles.net/blog/?p=626#comment-32367</guid>
		<description>I tested both Sun&#039;s and Exadel&#039;s Eclipse plugin for JavaFX last thursday; neither was capable of compiling the JFXtras projects (common + control). Sun&#039;s didn&#039;t even make it through the build phase, and Exadels did but I ran into two problems. Exadel is trying to replicate that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tested both Sun&#8217;s and Exadel&#8217;s Eclipse plugin for JavaFX last thursday; neither was capable of compiling the JFXtras projects (common + control). Sun&#8217;s didn&#8217;t even make it through the build phase, and Exadels did but I ran into two problems. Exadel is trying to replicate that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
